CASE FILE #007

THE WET NOSE INCIDENT

MISSION LOG

I knew this case was a mistake the moment they mentioned the gynecologist.

Still, a question had been raised, and apparently somebody decided it required professional investigation.

That somebody should be investigated next.

THE DISCOVERY

The assignment brought me to a local women’s health center, where I was presented with two subjects that had absolutely no business appearing in the same sentence:

A nearsighted gynecologist.

And a puppy.

Then came the question.

What do a nearsighted gynecologist and a puppy have in common?

I should have left.

I did not.

THE INVESTIGATION

I reviewed the evidence.

I checked the eye chart.

I checked my notes.

Then I checked the puppy.

The puppy sat quietly beside me, wagging its tail and displaying absolutely no concern about where this investigation was headed.

Then the answer arrived.

A wet nose.

My pencil stopped.

The puppy remained cheerful.

Professional curiosity had officially betrayed me.

FEATHERED THOUGHT

There’s an old saying in journalism: never ask a question you don’t want answered.

I had always assumed that was metaphorical.

I no longer do.

FINAL NOTE

The puppy was cleared of all involvement.

The gynecologist was not contacted for further comment.

No further questions were asked.

I’ve seen enough.

Next
Next

THE POST-COITAL SMOKE INVESTIGATION